Fast Company posts a lengthy article about design and designers, hoping to make the case that the way to differentiate your product from someone else’s is good design.
Including profiles of trendsetters like ex-Gucci man Tom Ford, Ford wunderkind J Mays and Robyn Waters who turned lowly retailer Target into trendy retailer Targét, we also learn The 5 Lessons of Design, none of which we took into account when creating the eye-bleeding masterpiece you see before you now.
So, why does glassdog look like it does?
When I started my re-design of the site, I knew only three things: I didn’t want it to look like any other collaborative (or non-collaborative) weblog out there; It still has to conform to certain informational placement and navigation forms; The spirit of the site would be defined by words or phrases like “in your face,” “combative,” “fresh (cheeky),” and “abrasive.”
I chose my collaborators carefully, I told them that there were no rules about what they could link to or say (anonymity was up to each individual for their own reasonsI could hardly be anonymous on my own site, now could I?), and I wanted the site’s visual design to broadcast those ‘take no prisoners’ rules while still hanging on (however faintly) to the idea of “pretty.”
Lately, I was enamored of Alexander Girard’s Millerstripe textile design. Girard was head of textiles at Herman Miller through the 60’s and based Millerstripe on materials he saw during his travels in Mexico and India. The uppermost strip of the header is my own Web-safe take on his design.
From there, all else came. The colors are pulled from that headpiece, the presentation ‘floats’ on a somewhat more subtle lavender background, entries appear on their own slight gradients and I built the interface to be both simple and loud at the same time.
Comments I’ve read around the Web seem mostly negative, but another goal was to simply grab attention, which it appears to have done.
Frankly, it would have been very easy to make yet another gray or blue web site with single-pixel lines delineating one piece from another. And an argument can easily be made that this design detracts from the content, overwhelming anything that is placed within it.
When I look at this design, I can’t help but smile. It’s way over-the-top, lacks any semblance of subtlety and uses maybe the most annoying palette of colors possible. It’s riding the fence between ugliness and beauty, and I’m sure that for many of you it falls very strongly towards ugly.
Luckily, you’re not my client for this project. And as far as goals are concerned, this achieves the ones set out for it beautifully.
Lance, aesthetic considerations aside, this Web site isn’t work safe. I have to disable the style sheets lest wary coworkers should think that I am occupying my time with frivolous things – which, of course, I am not.
Could you please modify the markup so that, when stylesheets are disabled, the text would be left-aligned instead of centered? Thanks.
Posted on June 10, 2004 1:04 PM
George, it’s not Lance’s job to make the internet work safe for you. If this isn’t something you should be reading at work, then don’t read it at work. Lance has better things to do than help make your ability to shirk easier.
Posted on June 10, 2004 3:09 PM
I have no specific issues with the stripes. You say they are design history,, who am I to argue. What I do take offense to is the photoshop-cheesy, semi-transparent plastic bevel crap you use for your big bold text. Yikes! Surprised a page curl hasn’t reared its ugly head. (insert Lens Flare emoticon here).
Posted on June 10, 2004 5:00 PM
I understand you rebel against all things Apple, and that is just peachy with me. So, this ‘bug’ might actually be a feature used to make us OSX users feel anger, but your buttons below the comment field are all blank. I see a short button, followed by a longer button, followed by another short button. Through trial and error, I figured out which I needed to click, but not without a brief period of that feeling you get when you eat something and you aren’t quite sure what it is.
Posted on June 10, 2004 5:04 PM
I like it. It looks like a bag of assorted boiled sweets. A nice step away from the usual corporate style blogs out there.
Posted on June 11, 2004 3:06 AM
I like it, but the first thing I though was “day-glo test pattern”.
Posted on June 11, 2004 5:24 PM
I love it!
It looks like no other web biggie’s blog while looking good all the same. If you’d care to try this at home, I suppose an argument of knowing the rules before breaking them could be made.
Posted on June 12, 2004 12:14 PM
Hmm, that eye-burning neon green looks oddly familiar…
http://www.gettingit.com/old/launch/
Posted on June 17, 2004 11:36 AM
Posted on June 10, 2004 at 10:11AM 8 Comments Permalink Read more in Art for Art's Sake
glassdog.com
At glassdog, articles concerning web design and development are posted, in addition to riffs on aspects of web community, web personalities and web trends.The Film Library Project: Part Three
The Film Library Project: Part Two
The Film Library Project: Part One
The Big Fat Open Directory in the Sky
Repositioning glassdog, Part 2
Repositioning glassdog.com, Part 1
LaConCon.com
"Lance Arthur's Conspicuous Consumption" is a site about stuff stuff to buy, stuff to use, stuff to look at and stuff to dream about.lancearthur.com: Just Write
"Just Write" is Lance Arthur's personal site, where he explains and discusses what's happening in his world, what he thinks of life in general and where he's going.Resolved: No More God Pretending
Confessions of a Bad Creative Director
Adventures in Erotic Dentistry